search ak13  
explore a series  
 world
ak13 world ak13 island ak13 terrain ak13 people ak13 matter ak13 points ak13 lives
 
current issue . . .
« Tom Freke - Far from the mad in crowd
« Samir Puri - Do not mention the 'V' word
« Jonn Elledge - Together alone
« Kathryn Corrick - Being poor is expensive
« My fridge
« Tom Freke - Gray Days
recently viewed articles . . .
« Disclaimer
« Together alone
« ak13 events
« Far from the mad in crowd
« About ak13
« My fridge
« Ten reasons . . . why America should fear Ukip
« Sell everything, even things you haven't got
« When the tables turn
Response - Reporting frenzy
Blogs Versus MSM
So 'Blogs' are 'merely' to be fact checkers for the mainstream media eh?

Is this the kind of patronising attitude that is the best reaction the corporate media can come up with as a 'rearguard' response to the rise of independent media?

For so long, we have not only been ignored but have been slandered with the label that we're not 'real' journalists, as if being the paid hacks of giant corporations makes you a 'real' journalist. Moreover, the contradiction of being used as 'fact checkers' after many years of being accused of not being accountable is rather galling.

Furthermore, my own site is used as a regular source of news and information for the corporate media (and all for free of course), a further irony considering the vast resources the corporate media has at its disposal.

Is it that so-called professional journalists are simply incompetent insofar as they have the same (if not better) access to the plethora of news sources available as I do?

Or perhaps it's much simpler; corporate bias in reportage of the news. Sifting through the large databases available to corporate media does not in and of itself make for good journalism.
William Bowles
30/03/2005
Response to John Lloyd
John was summarized as saying that right-wing bloggers were after the media which they perceive as liberal. I grew up in an era where the liberal side of most things had a proprietary sense about their causes and they were not shy about inimidating "regular folk" into silence with their tactics.

It's interesting to see the right-wing using some of the same tactics that have been used by the other side for generations.

Certainly we can all share our embarrassment at how both sides bulldoze the opposition with their rhetoric, but I can only applaud the development that there are now two sides to the media. What's also interesting is the way that this blogging has brought global issues, which most of us have felt unable to be part of, down to a level where the individual has a voice.

Is there a futurist in the house who can see where this will lead us in the next five years?
Stuart
28/03/2005
Blogs
Google a look at perseus' blog survey from 2003. It's pretty interesting.
Katie
24/03/2005
Send us your response to this article.
Subject
Your Response
Your Name
Your Email
original article »
Are weblogs irresponsible? Natalie Hanman reports.
Natalie Hanman
24/03/2005
Fifty years ago, it was fashionable for those with artistic leanings to want to be a writer of literary novels. With the emergence of punk and rock, everyone was suddenly in a DIY band. Then dance music hit, and no house was without its Technics turntables.

Now, it seems, everyone that is anyone wants to be a journalist. The Internet has brought instant, easy and mostly free publication to any budding blogger with access to a computer, digital camera or camcorder. Citizen journalism is the new black – or something like that – but what does it all mean for the future of media?

What was the event?

The Fall and Fall of Journalism, LSE Media Group.

Where was it held?

Hong Kong Theatre, Clement House, Aldwych.

Who were the speakers?

Editor of journalistic.co.uk Leslie Bunder, blogger Suw Charman, editor of the Financial Times Magazine John Lloyd and Dixons Chair . . .  read »
. . . read more in the surveillance series
Copyright © 2003-2010 ak13.com. All rights reserved.
commentary reportage satire :: ak13 :: commentary reportage satire